I think it works the other way round. When we see an opportunity to have a bigger say--or when the stakes are higher--we jump for it, *more* than when it's obviously a smaller influence such as a vote between two pretty similar politicians. Hence the much more hotly contested local elections, where people believe their influence is greater. And fiercly fought union elections (it's stunning to me that anyone wins a private sector union election here any more given that the boss is free to do almost anything--but we do win them.) Here's another example: We in Florida would've--the radicals among us--taken a hell of a lot more militant action on the vote theft if it hadn't been for the fact that the object of all this was, well, Al Gore. I mean, only the most dedicated (bless 'em) can force up much enthusiasm for the Democratic Party anymore. It's dumped its constituency in a ditch on the way to a party with Worldcom & Co. If it weren't for abortion and Social Security, it'd be all up. So my point is, we're more ready for democracy than we might look from looking at our participation in elections in the U.S.
Jenny Brown