Christian scholars say no war
Carl Remick
carlremick at hotmail.com
Fri Sep 27 08:09:29 PDT 2002
>From: Bradford DeLong <jbdelong at uclink.berkeley.edu>
>
>Assuming--in 1945--that the war could be ended some other way would seem to
>be an even less safe assumption. Japan could not have launched the war.
>Japan could have surrendered after Midway. Japan could have surrendered
>after Guadalcanal. Japan could have surrendered after Saipan. Japan could
>have surrendered after the Marianas. Japan could have surrendered after the
>Battle of Leyte Gulf. Japan could have surrendered after the conquest of
>Iwo Jima. Japan could have surrendered after the conquest of Okinawa.
>
>The Japanese military government didn't.
>
>So I've never seen how the alternative strategy--which seems to involve
>simply mopping up the Japanese army in China and waiting for the Japanese
>generals and admirals to surrender--is supposed to have worked.
>
>Brad DeLong
How much oil did Japan have on hand in 1945? I frankly have no idea, but I
imagine their oil supplies must have been dwindling. If so, why couldn't
the US just have blockaded Japan and waited for their oil to run out?
Carl
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list