Doug Henwood wrote:
>
>
> Several times now I've asked all you folks how you'd defend any kind
> of progressive regime against U.S. hostility, and I've yet to hear an
> approximation of an answer. I'm guessing it's because you don't have
> one, but I won't give up hope yet.
>
But by definition any regime which provokes u.s. hostility is a non-progressive regime. Isn't it?
Hence there cannot be any progressive regime which needs defense against u.s. hostility.
Carrol