On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 08:55:12PM -0700, Chuck Grimes wrote:
>
> ``..He's (Wannisky) broadly consistent with the extreme free
> trade/zero capital taxers, finance market types, though his gold
> fixation is a fringe position not not held by right-wingers. Roughly
> libertarian, I would say...'' Max Sawicky
>
> ----
>
> Awesome, Max.
>
> I have to say, you bring the discernment of a kennel club expert's
> abilities to bare on these pouches, noting the distinguishing marks of
> the breeds. I couldn't have figured out one entrant from another, and
> here you don't bother to even lift their tails!
>
> As I remember you, Chip, Justin or somebody else had detailed out a
> whole genealogy of these critters with the paleos, neos, lithos,
> harpos, etc. Remember?
>
> Maybe you could point me back to those posts or on the web somewhere.
>
> See, it seems to me that the University of Chicago figured big in both
> the econ and pol sci crew. It's hard not to think that the same people
> who have become policy makers now didn't all get exposed to
> something like a Strauss influence in their political science courses
> along with some consistent economics themes, say Milton Friedman?
>
> There are of course whole other breeding lines and mutant pools of
> this elite conservative co-mating consilience, say revolving around
> Stanford out here, or Harvard and Yale back there.
>
> What I want to find is some commonality of experience, a class or
> social reaction of some sort to the student revolts that racked their own
> student days.
>
> I don't know, something in economics that corresponds to say to the
> dark bonding of Perle and Wolfowitz under Wolfstretter.
>
> Chuck Grimes
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu