[lbo-talk] Re: Cuba petition (Chomsky, Zinn, Ariel Dorfman et. al.)

Dennis Perrin dperrin at comcast.net
Sat Apr 26 06:16:55 PDT 2003



> Maybe I am thick, but isn't it odd that neither of these U.S. generated
> petitions condemns our own government for pumping millions of dollars into
> opposition groups in what no-one disagrees is a foreign attempt to
> destabilize the Cuban government? And which it seems reasonable to
believe
> is a provocation.


> Jenny Brown

Well, here's the CPD petition in full:

"We, the undersigned, strongly protest the current wave of repression in Cuba. We condemn the arrests of scores of opponents of the Cuban government for their nonviolent political activities, and the shockingly long prison sentences - some as high as 28 years - imposed after unfair trials. According to Amnesty International, the arrestees include journalists, owners of private libraries and members of illegal opposition parties. We condemn as well the trial and execution of three alleged hijackers in a week's time, both for the lack of due process and because we oppose capital punishment on principle.

"As anti-war, social justice and human rights advocates, we condemned the brutal Saddam Hussein regime, and we oppose the United States occupation of Iraq. We support civil liberties and democratic rights everywhere, regardless of the country's economic, political or social system. We believe it is imperative to be consistent in opposing repression wherever it takes place, whether in Iraq or Saudi Arabia, Israel or Cuba, Turkey or the United States. Democratic change in Cuba needs to be achieved by the Cuban people themselves. The Cuban government's violations of democratic rights do not justify sanctions or any other form of intervention by the United States in Cuba. The government of the United States - which employs the rhetoric of human rights when doing so promotes its imperial goals, but maintains a discreet silence or makes only token protests when U.S. allies are involved, and which fully supports the barbaric practice of capital punishment, routinely inflicted in the U.S. - is hardly in a position to preach democracy and human rights.

"And we recall too the long, criminal record of U.S. interventions in Latin America. This record has included six decades of exploitation and imperial control of Cuba, followed by an attempted invasion and a campaign of international terrorism and economic warfare, that is by now well-documented. Only a government that repudiated this record, renounced any intention of restoring its economic or political domination over Cuba, either directly or through rightwing Cuban-American proxies, and promised to respect the democratic will of the Cuban people themselves would have the moral legitimacy to call for democratic change in Cuba.

"As the Bush administration, further emboldened by its military victory in Iraq, threatens to wage 'preemptive' wars around the globe we reaffirm our support for the right of self-determination in Cuba and our strong opposition to the U.S. policy of economic sanctions that has brought such suffering to the Cuban people.

"At the same time, we support democracy in Cuba. The imprisonment of people for attempting to exercise their rights of free expression is outrageous and unacceptable. We call on the Castro government to release all political prisoners and let the Cuban people speak, write and organize freely."

Seems pretty direct to me. And after some reflection, I signed it, along with other counter-revolutionaries like Chomsky, Zinn, Naomi Klein, Ehrenreich, etc.

DP



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list