> > refusal _ever_ to have sexual intercourse is
>> probably grounds for divorce in every state.
>
>I thought this "grounds for divorce" stuff was old-fashioned? I think
>you only have you say: this is broken.
>
>One partner saying it makes it true, no?
>
>I haven't come across a "list" of things that can (have to?) be invoked
>in order to get a divorce.
Not in NY State. Cruelty, adultery, "constructive abandonment" (refusal to have sex). You've gotta come up with one.
Doug