[lbo-talk] Give Up

[R]

i get the impression you're taking this very seriously, doug.   don't you
really think it's a better experiment than carrol's idea?

which 1/2 do you prefer?   there are several statistical sampling procedures
we could use.   we could start with the lawyer/politicians ....

frankly, my bias is that it won't make any difference in the scheme of
things.   so, i don't perceive the element of risk you appear to see.   and
it's more fair than getting rid of all of them.

R

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Doug Henwood
To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Give Up

R wrote:


>rather than go to the extreme of committing a frivolous crime, carrol,
let's
>simply see if we can get 1/2 of them disbarred and see if it really makes
>any difference in the scheme of things.

Which half? That's a pretty innovative approach to social policy -
let's do something radical whose effects we can't imagine just to see
what happens.

Doug
___________________________________
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk