--- dave dorkin <ddorkin1 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Perhaps you mean something else by movement or are
> switching between political and
> intellectual/academic
> senses. If you are talking about some key
> politicians
> who are in a major party, fine but certainly there
> is
> no point in even considering logical positivism
> either
> in that case.
>
> Besides Wolfie and that handful, there are just a
> few
> academics and other assorted hacks who are
> influenced
> by Strauss and you could easily go through
> university
> without hearing of them ever. On the other hand,
> tons
> of people (both academics and students) read Marcuse
> et al still today. Certainly a major part and reason
> why we have all these critical theory departments
> etc.
> which have impacted several disciplines and are
> present in just about every university. Their books
> are in university bookstores and on reading lists
> all
> over.
>
> --- andie nachgeborenen
> > Frankfurters, though influential, did not
> establish
> > a movement, much less one that became widespread;
> (c) same with Arendt. But (d) the logical
> positivists, some of whom, like my teacher Carl
> Hempel, were German, were emigrants and did
> establish
> a movement that becvame widespread in the US -- as I
> remarked.
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
> design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com