> It may be that the somewhat harsh criticisms of his
> work and thought I've read from listmembers today are
> justified.
Don't worry, they're not.
Zizek is down with the Revo. And he keeps getting more radical (and more dialectical) as time goes on -- much of his earlier work was heavily speculative, but since the mid-1990s, there's this turn towards the concrete. In many ways, he's the theoretical heir of Bourdieu.
-- DRR