>The same strange vagueness seems to afflict most
>people making this case. Unless I've missed something,
>Peter K. still hasn't, despite being asked by several
>people (including me), explained who the "leftist
>flacks for Saddam and Osama" are. I guess it's enough
>just to assert they exist, rather than going to the
>trouble of naming them and quoting what they've said.
Hey, it's just like calling someone a comsymp during the Cold War. Very effective, even if you've got no evidence. Except that the Commies were worthy of more sympathy than ObL.
Doug