WSJ...Oreilly Factor Next?

[loupaulsen at attbi.com]

> At 03:14 PM 2/13/03 -0800, Thomas Seay wrote:
> >You can take Lou's suggestion and "not give in" and it
> >turns into a tug of war in which each side just tries
> >to drag the other, or you can just let go of the rope
> >and let the other side fall on their ass.  Giving him
> >the time to speak would achieve this latter and would
> >be much more effective and elegant solution to this
> >problem.  It's judo.
> 
> Great minds think alike! All I can think of when it comes to Lerner is that 
> he's like a terrier, as described in The Sweet Potato Queens' Book of Love 
> In our experience...his tenacity is 
> like that of one of those unrelenting Boston terriers that will bite the 
> end of a rope and then you can swing the rope, dog and all, around over 
> your head a hundred miles an hour all day long and the brute will never let 
> go."

Should there then be a blanket principle that in the future all "terriers" 
must be permitted to speak at whatever functions they want to, because if we 
don't give in to them they will organize unpleasant publicity campaigns?  Just 
asking.

LP