>Nathan Newman wrote:
>
>>Comparing the speakers at NYC's UFPJ Saturday rally to the shrunken narrow
>>group of sectarians I heard when I was down in ANSWER's DC rally last
>>November just highlights why I think ANSWER is such a blight on the movement
>>and why I'm celebrating after Saturday my hopes for their marginalization
>>from now on.
>
>I'll drink to that!
>
>To the marginalization and irrelevance of ANSWER!
>
>Chuck0
just so no one whines:
"The only way we can win the political victory for Marxism here is by out-organizing the anarchists. Therefore, when you accuse my party of tailing after the anarchists, you endow us with insufficient ambition. Our intent is not just to tail after anarchists, but to catch up with them, overtake them, get in front of them, and show them what communist theory and practice really are capable of. I want to demonstrate to them, in practice, that it is possible - POSSIBLE - not only to wreck symbols of imperialist property, but to wreck the imperialist property RELATION."
Happy VD! Belatedly!
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/rad-green/2001-July/000116.html