> Lerner has been waging a campaign against ANSWER, not just
> criticizing ANSWER. The Joint Statement talks about "public attacks" and
> "working to discredit," NOT about "criticizing", "dissent", etc. I wonder
> how many times I will have to write that and explain the difference? If we
>do a joint action with UFPJ here in Chicago, I hereby agree in advance
not
> to nominate anyone as a speaker who has libelled UFPJ in the pages of
the
> Chicago Tribune.
huge grey area..... "public attacks" and "working to discredit" could go either way....... even if they restricted it to 'libel', which they didn't, it's still a stupid rule.
~M.E.
===== Quenby Ellis
"No"- pulic domain
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com