Right of Return

Max B. Sawicky sawicky at bellatlantic.net
Thu Feb 20 15:02:04 PST 2003


Well, I think the American liberal antiwar constituancy is _well_ aware of the Palestinian issue and its connection to this war, and therefore is is a quite legitimate part of an antiwar platform that wants to stop war by addressing the roots of war in the Middle East. And, since American liberal opinion _in practice_ implicitly recognizes an unlimited Jewish right of return (by never discussing it, of course), it is racist to explicitly exclude mention of the Palestinian right of return. . . .

It would be racist to deny the claim underlying a Palestinian right of return. But an end to a Jewish right or a beginning of a Palestinian right of return are equivalent to destroying the Jewish state. Even without a Palestinian right of return, the Jews would eventually be outnumbered in Israel proper, forget about the West Bank. So as compromise it asks for the Jews to give up quite a bit. The argument that they are not entitled in the first place has foundation but zero political relevance. Real compromises begin from the facts on the ground. That the initial position is unfair does not negate the practical outlines of a realistic compromise that aggrieves both parties the least.

mbs



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list