Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> But you could have
> made that point without THE CAPITALIZED EPITHETS. Gar's a
> worker-friendly humane fellow - can't you give people the benefit of
> the doubt
Doug is for the most part correct here, and wholly correct in regard to my second post. I agree that Gar is worker-friendly. Had it been Chuck0 involved I would not even have bothered to reply. The first post was a quick response off the top of my head, a warning shot. I stick by it.
But there was no reason not to adopt a more reasonable tone in the second post.
Carrol