Each writer makes an argument for the significance of the object (be it a consumption good or anything else) of his or her analysis, which each reader is free to accept or reject. Mintz does that well for sugar: what changes in the relations of production and consumption have made sugar a mass consumption good, what impacts mass production and consumption of sugar have had on working-class lives, etc. You can do the same for any object that you wish to analyze, which others are free to evaluate according to our various priorities. -- Yoshie
* Calendar of Events in Columbus: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/calendar.html> * Student International Forum: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/> * Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio> * Solidarity: <http://solidarity.igc.org/>