My point, which I thought was easy enough to understand, is that referring to Israeli and US nukes says nothing about allowing Iraq to get them. I mean, if he stays in power, he's gonna want a few. Right? So the question is, should he be allowed develop a small arsenal? The feeling here seems to be, so what, no big deal, Israel and the US are worse, blah blah blah. I mean, if you don't care that Saddam gets nukes, at least say it openly and don't dodge the issue by going on about Sharon and Bush.
DP