> My point, which I thought was easy enough to understand, is that referring
> to Israeli and US nukes says nothing about allowing Iraq to get them. I
> mean, if he stays in power, he's gonna want a few. Right? So the question
> is, should he be allowed develop a small arsenal? The feeling here seems
to
> be, so what, no big deal, Israel and the US are worse, blah blah blah. I
> mean, if you don't care that Saddam gets nukes, at least say it openly and
> don't dodge the issue by going on about Sharon and Bush.
Why the UN Inspection is not adequate if Perrin thinks its important to denuclearise Iraq? What is Perrin's solution to North Korean nukes? War?
Ulhas