Badly drafted law? Was Re: Raimondo on Ritter

DoreneFC at aol.com DoreneFC at aol.com
Fri Jan 24 08:30:57 PST 2003


Okay, but

1. Ritter was arrested and charged IN ALBANY, not in federal court. So for whatever reason the federal law was not invoked.

2. If the federal law were invoked, wouldn't there be a nasty states right dispute brewing because state ages of consent are lower than the federal one and because some state statutes are more nuanced about age differences between the parties and / or gender of the participants.

3. What if the person doing the inducing is a horny minor, say a 13-year-old emailing his friend's 16-year-old sister? Is that possibility just taken care of in general somewhere else in the federal code?

This of course does not change whether Ritter knows what he is talking about with respect to weapons inspections. Plus he has two daughters that are like 9 years old and presumably he has thesame "no one is good enough for my kid..." reflexes as other fathers.

DoreneC

DoreneC

In a message dated 1/24/2003 8:16:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com writes:


>
> See 18 USC § 2422 (Coercion and enticement)
>
>
> (a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or
> coerces any individual to travel in interstate or
> foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of
> the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in
> any sexual activity for which any person can be
> charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so,
> shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
> than 10 years, or both.
>
> (b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means
> of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the
> special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the
> United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices,
> or coerces any individual who has not attained the age
> of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any
>
> sexual activity for which any person can be charged
> with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall
> be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 15
> years, or both.
>
> See also UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON, 221 F.3d 83, 86 (2d
> Cir. 2000) (appeal of sentence involving a guilty plea
> of individual who had sex with (among others) a
> sixteen year old girl he met on the internet).
>
> CREDIT(S)
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20030124/9b6344a3/attachment.htm>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list