> belied by pics of 16 wk undead thumb sucking little babies. (It's Jenny
you
> were responding to, by the way, and she's one helluva a smart, witty,
> sassy, classy, interesting person who actually works as an activist in
> serious ways.
I was responding (at least I think I was) to a post by Yoshie, aka "what's her name." What I've read of Jenny's, I've liked, for the most part. Much better than "whoever she is . . ." And in that post was a positive statement about the extended abortion limits in Sweden. That, and that alone, is what I was responding to. I don't know how much clearer I can make this.
As for the rest of your post, what can I say? I'm willing to talk about this seriously, and have tried. Yes, I've used provocative language -- who here doesn't (certainly not you, right?)? But I've also stated clearly what my position is. In return I get called a "right winger" and there the matter ends. Only Nathan and Joanna (and to a degree Chuck) have taken the topic to a deeper level, and I've openly acknowledged it. As for you, dear Kel . . . well, I must say I don't get half of what you're talking about here. You spray the room with bullets, then curtsey. It's a cute act, but I admit it leaves me bewildered at times.
DP