http://www.ustr.gov/new/fta/chile.htm http://www.ustr.gov/new/fta/singapore.htm
since they are just as susceptible to abuse by Bush et al. E.g. regarding intracompany transfers (i.e. the L-1 visa):
http://www.ustr.gov/new/fta/Singapore/final/text%20final.PDF
> SECTION III : INTRA-COMPANY TRANSFEREES
> 1. Each Party shall grant temporary entry and provide confirming
> documentation to a business person employed by an enterprise who
> seeks to render services to that enterprise or a subsidiary or
> affiliate thereof, in a capacity that is managerial, executive, or
> involves specialized knowledge, provided that the business person
> otherwise complies with existing immigration measures applicable to
> temporary entry. A Party may require the business person to have
> been employed continuously by the enterprise for one year within the
> three-year period immediately preceding the date of the application
> for admission. The Parties understand that, as used in this
> paragraph, "a business person employed by an enterprise who seeks to
> render services to that enterprise or a subsidiary or affiliate
> thereof, in a capacity that is managerial, executive or involves
> special knowledge" has the same meaning as "managers, executives and
> specialists" as defined in relation to intra-corporate transferees
> in a Party's Schedule of Specific Commitments to the GATS.
> 2. A Party shall not:
> (a) as a condition for temporary entry under paragraph 1, require
> labor certification tests or other procedures of similar effect; or
> (b) impose or maintain any numerical restriction relating to
> temporary entry under paragraph 1.
2b spikes L-1 limitation efforts; 2a would arguably spike, e.g., prevailing-wage requirements.
Note that
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/itlmi/message/75
> the White House is working to secure swift approval by Congress of
> the US-Chile and US-Singapore free trade agreements before the
> summer congressional recess, i.e. in the next 2-3 weeks.