[lbo-talk] I don't get it..

[andie nachgeborenen]

I never said "always." I never said "never." In fact I
also said we knew that SH _once_ had such weapons. I
also said that in 2003 -- not in 1991 -- we knew he
didn't. _You_ knew it too. I'll thank you not to imply
that I am a SH apologist, and I'dd return the favor
and not imply that you ana pologist for imperialist
war. jks

--- Dennis Perrin <dperrin at comcast.net> wrote:
> > I always said --
> > you can look it up in the archives -- that we
> _knew_
> > that there were no WMDs, otherwise the US would
> not
> > have attacked Iraq.
> 
> I'll take your word, Justin, that you always "knew."
> But Saddam surely had
> weapons in 1991, and the US attacked him in Kuwait.
> So I think that part of
> your argument doesn't hold up. It is true, however,
> that the US prefers
> attacking weaker countries -- the more disarmed the
> better. But the first
> Gulf War took place before the UN sent inspectors
> into Iraq, and only a few
> years after the disastrous Iran/Iraq war.
> 
> DP
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com