> Brian Siano wrote:
>
>> Oh, it has lots of continuing relevance. This way, when newcomers or
>> young'uns come in, the older cranks can denounce them as revanchists or
>> Schactmanites or bourgeous adventurists or neo-liberals or running dog
>> lackeys. Then the newcomers have to go off and research things like the
>> Ludlow Massacre and the Kronstadt Uprising and analyze them unto the
>> fifth decimal place so they can place themselves in a very specific and
>> particular sect. Then they can throw the same epithets at the newcomers
>> they have to deal with.
>
> Ok, so what's your position on Pabloism?
Original position, revisionist position, neo-Marxist interpretation, or its role in the neoliberal schema?
Overall, I think further study is warranted.