>Oh, it has lots of continuing relevance. This way, when newcomers or
>young'uns come in, the older cranks can denounce them as revanchists
>or Schactmanites or bourgeous adventurists or neo-liberals or
>running dog lackeys. Then the newcomers have to go off and research
>things like the Ludlow Massacre and the Kronstadt Uprising and
>analyze them unto the fifth decimal place so they can place
>themselves in a very specific and particular sect. Then they can
>throw the same epithets at the newcomers they have to deal with.
Ok, so what's your position on Pabloism?
Doug