On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 19:10:13 -0400 Brian Siano <siano at mail.med.upenn.edu>
writes:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:53:36 -0400, Jim Farmelant
> <farmelantj at juno.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:29:11 -0400 Brian Siano
> <siano at mail.med.upenn.edu>
> > writes:
> >> I forget who posted about that four-hour firefight in Iraq. But
> CNN's
> >>
> >> reporting that, among the casualties, are Saddam Hussein's sons
> Uday and
> >> Qusay.
> >
> > Weren't Uday and Qusay already killed at least a couple of times
> > along with their father? And what about Saddam's cousing,
> > "Chemical Ali"? He was supposed to have been killed in
> > an air raid, then weeks after the war had "ended," Rummy
> > was saying that he might still be alive. Withour further
> > corroboration, why should anyone take this report seriously?
> >
> Because good news is always welcome?
I guess that sort of news is welcome for the Bushies, after a week's worth of the story about the alleged Iraqi uranium deal with Niger, being plastered on the front pages of the nation's newspapers. "How convenient" as the Church Lady used to say on SNL.
Jim F.
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!