[lbo-talk] Norman Geras of NLR, Pro-War?!

andie nachgeborenen andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 29 20:18:54 PDT 2003


An interesting interview. As one suspected, he's a creature of a higher order than Hitch, we stands revealed as a glib publicist, nice to have had on one's side, but pretty empty. There is much is Geras' interview that resonates with me, though I'd characterize myself (at this point) as a Marxian-tinged liberal rather than (as he does) as a liberal-tinged Marxist. I also don't find it necessary to be as apologetic about the Marxian tradition as he seems to, or as embarassed about hanging on to hope. Still, the general tone of disillusioned lack of reconciliation is familair from the inside.

What is strange, though, is the bizarre focus on 9/11 as a unique crime that stands outside history and resists comparison to or explanation in terms of anything else. As if -- maybe he picked this up from the worst of the Holocaust whores -- one could not both condemn and understand, as if to put the crime in perspective was to dimisnish it. The fact of the matter is that killing 3,000 innocents for no good raeson is what US imperialism does every day before breakfast. That does mean one shouldn't be mad about 9/11, or that al Qaida ought not to have been (by proper and lawful police methods) eradicated and its leaders brought to justice.

But somehow Geras has allowed this particular crime to upset his entire vision of the world. And to drag in Iraq! which -- though an utterly loathesome regime, as we were saying when it was a pet of US imperialism, a bulwark of stability, and Saddam and Rummy were bosom buddies (Chomsky called him -- Saddam, I mean -- a "bloodsoaked tyrant"; this was in the mid-80s) 00 had nothing to do with 9/11. Moreover, Geras has fallan in love with American democracy, and suggests that it is improper to attack the psychopathic funadmentalist moron who was placed in the White House by the Supre court because he's a democratic leader? There is some basic disconnect here.

So, again, it's sad. Geras will be a greater and more lasting asset to the other side because he is a serious and thoughtful writer, and a greater loss to us. --he's sort of Signey Hook figure, unlike Hitchen's Whittaker Chambers. It is very regrettable.

jks

--- Luke Weiger <lweiger at umich.edu> wrote:
> > Another victim of whatever got Hitchens. Very sad.
> I
> > have learned a lot from Geras over the years.
> Unlike
> > Hitchens, he was a real scholar.
> >
> > jks
>
>
http://info.bris.ac.uk/~plcdib/imprints/normangerasinterview.html
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list