[lbo-talk] the $ worth of difference

Jon Johanning jjohanning at igc.org
Sun Jun 15 08:29:27 PDT 2003


This is one reason I don't quite agree with Carrol's dictum that supporting Democrats is giving up politically. If the Democratic Party (much as we love to hate it) became essentially toothless because of lack of money, we would really have a one-party state, and I might need to begin to re-think my oft-stated position that the current situation in the U.S. is not comparable to Nazi Germany.

The DP seems to have be stuck in a cruel dilemma: as long as politics is largely conducted via TV, and candidates don't get free air time, it costs huge numbers of bucks to run campaigns. Collecting $50,000 from one contributor is obviously much easier than collecting it from 5,000 contributors at $10 each, so Democratic candidates have to go after essentially the same big pockets as the Republicans, and these days the Republicans are much more successful at those stratospheric heights. OTOH, even if they were as successful, it would just mean that they would be as indebted to Mr. Moneybags as the Republicans are. As it said in that WP article:


> Georgetown's Bailey said that as long as Republicans control Congress
> and
> the White House, "the Democrats will have to work harder and harder" to
> win over business. "The more they'll have to do what business likes," he
> said.

The only way out of the dilemma, it seems to me, is a really massive, truly "grass-roots" campaign for a Democratic candidate, which I doubt will be feasible by next year. So perhaps we will have to live through four more years of Bush-induced torture, while a real grass-roots takeover of the DP gets underway.

Jon Johanning // jjohanning at igc.org _______________________________ "Play the guitar like you don't know how to play." (Miles' instruction to John McLaughlin)



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list