What she did say, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MCK204B.html
My beef w/her is that she hired Steve, "Jewish Doctors Inject Black Babies With AIDS, " Cokely, to be her volunteer coordinator in her re- election campaign.
And, about two months ago to a reporter for the far right-wing, "American Free Press, " formerly, The Spotlight (hell, if Willis Carto, called it, "The Thunderbolt, " of Dr. Ed Fields of the neo-nazi/KKK National State Rights Party http://www.alphalink.com.au/~radnat/usanazis/chapter2.html ) credulous progressives that see anything anti-establishment as worthy of belief, might not reprint crap from them) she lauded their coverage of 9-11. http://mckinneysucks.blogspot.com/ aka "What Didn't REALLY Happen.com." "Left gate keeper, John Foster Dulles "Chip" Berlet..." http://www.questionsquestions.net/topics/left_gatekeepers.html Chip on 9-11 conspiranoia, http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/conspiracism- 911.html http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/blackmail.html http://www.ecologynews.com/cuenews43updates3.html http://www.democraticunderground.com/duforum/DCForumID43/5698.html http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0212/S00144.htm http://www.rense.com/general19/cons.htm http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/pacifica.html Heh. 9-11 Coverup At Pacifica Radio!
Why have Pacifica Radio's major news broadcasters -- Amy Goodman of Democracy Now and Dennis Bernstein of Flashpoints -- refused to cover the facts about 9-11 that prove government complicity?
Amy Goodman has, on two separate occasions, been handed piles of documentation about the true facts of 9-11 -- books, videotapes, etc. She has never broadcast any of the information or even communicated with the people who gave it to her.
I have spoken with Dennis Bernstein, and told him about the major "smoking guns" of government complicity in 9-11 -- the defense stand-down, the missing 100,000 pounds of steel and aluminum debris from the plane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon, the cell-phone calls that were shown by experiment to have been impossible to make, and the seismic pulses indicating explosions that occurred at the beginning of the fall of each WTC tower.
That is, I tried to tell him about these things, but was unable to finish, because he repeatedly interrupted to say that if there is anything to claims of government complicity, he doesn't need to broadcast about it, because others are doing so.
In fact, unless this information is broadcast several hours per week in prime time, on all of the five Pacifica stations, it won't reach enough people in time to stop the creation of a totalitarian police state by the Bush junta.
Here's why: 1. Pacifica only reaches 1/4 of the American people. 2. Most people in the broadcast areas don't listen to it. 3. Of those who do listen, many won't be able to hear the program at the time it's broadcast. 4. Some of those who hear it are so brainwashed by the lies on TV about 9-11 that they won't believe the truth. 5. Of those who do believe the information, many will have to hear it several times before they're motivated to act on it. 6. In order to stop the junta, people who listen to and understand the 9-11 information have to tell enough of their friends, relatives, newspaper editors, etc., about it to pressure their senators and representatives to impeach Bush, Cheney, and their co-conspirators.
Taking into account all of these factors, it's clear that in order to have an actual effect on the fascist junta that has taken control of the United States, Pacifica must broadcast the truth about 9-11 in such a way that it's heard multiple times by everyone in its entire listening audience. This means several hours a week in prime time on all five stations.
Why does Larry Bensky -- a very influential broadcaster in Pacifica -- attack and belittle the researchers who have discovered these facts and are trying to get non-corporate media like Pacifica to broadcast them to the people?
[Click here] to listen to Bensky intercept a listener's question on 9-11 before Gus Newport, the new KPFA General Manager, can answer it.
Remarks by Bensky and Newport just before the call are included, with Bensky giving the usual excuse that there's just not enough time to broadcast what people want, while Newport suggests what should be obvious -- to weight (prioritize) the selection of broadcast material according to its importance in the current situation. (April 27, 2003)