There is a boneheaded quality to this statement, which is a mixture of:
A.) Desperation (the insistence that those weapons must exist and weren't used for cagey reasons)
B.) A Papal-esque absolution of the Americans of any responsibility for angering ordinary Iraqis - all resistance comes from those damned Baathists
and
C.) A strange assumption that the goal of resisters is the creation of a UN administration, instead of the expulsion of foreigners
The profound depth of the self-delusion displayed, even as the author(s) strive to sound a wake-up call, beggars the imagination. I don't doubt that the Baathists are waging a guerilla war but the insistence that they are the sole source of anti-occupation feeling and action suggests a knumbskullery, which exceeds my descriptive ability.
This is what astounds me about these criticisms of the Iraq occupation from elites, even in their self-corrections they show a stubborn unwillingness to see the situation whole.
These are the 'best and brightest'?
DRM
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com