This does not create anything like a "free informed choice" situation. It is pretty much like being held hostage in a closet for five months. It distorts your mental processes. People have been repeatedly told that there IS no choice about the war. To paraphrase some new age crap, "We can't control whether there is a war or not. We can only control our feelings about it." Well, if we say that we support the war, then we live in a democracy, the troops are risking their lives for a purpose, Bush isn't like Hitler, we don't have to feel like guilty Germans, we can be happy and live our lives. But if we say that we oppose the war, then we are in a horrible situation, we are being made accomplices to mass murder and there's apparently nothing we can do about it. Saying "I support the war" in these circumstances is not a statement of opinion. It's a coping mechanism.
lp
>
> From: Wojtek Sokolowski <sokol at jhu.edu>
>
> That does not surprise me at all. In my old country, the ruling elite
> always enjoyed over 95% support whatever they did. As they used to say
> in my old country, paper is very patient, it accepts everything.
> CB: How's it going. Wojtek ? I'll buy that analysis. I'd add that there can
> be a lot of negative reinforcment for opposing the President or the war, like
> losing your job, being spied on by the U.S. secret police, being chastised by
> peers.