Profundity today....and tomorrow...and tomorrow

Max B. Sawicky sawicky at bellatlantic.net
Mon Mar 31 05:09:32 PST 2003


I think Plan A was decapitation, or euphemistically, "leadership targeting." Going for a knockout in the first round, in other words, which leaves you in less shape for a longer fight. In this case, the cost was using up a lot of smart bombs that take time to replace (a third or so of the arsenal is the # I heard). This plan jives with the mythology of the war -- just get rid of Saddam and everything else falls into place.

Plan B looks to be killing the fanatical military forces (Repub guard, 'terrorist' militias), after which everything will fall into place. Still mythology.

Plan C would be the carpet bombing, combined with Israeli style urban pacification. We're not there yet. Here the mythology is that the U.S. could do this an not absorb damage in other spheres -- regional instability, more terrorism, diplomatic fall-out with allies.

They lose no matter what they do, from this vantage point.

mbs

-----Original Message----- From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com]On Behalf Of Chuck Grimes Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 1:36 AM To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com Subject: Re: Profundity today....and tomorrow...and tomorrow

Most profound statement from a military leader: Gen. Tommy Franks, refuting criticism of a "pause" in the ground war, said, "We have the power to be patient." Carl

-----------

Yes evidently the much touted Rumsfelt war Plan A, code named Blitzkrieg-on-the-Cheap or Nazi-Lite for short, hasn't worked. So apparently we are changing to Plan B. Since Plan A, slaughtering their military and overthrowing their government failed to win the hearts and mind of the Iraqi people, then Plan B should work. Plan B. We will now proceed to carpet bomb them back to their senses, before we liberate them.

So then if Plan B fails, then what?

Plan C. We decimate Iraq using plain old fashioned dumb bombs and artillery leveling most of its cities, infrastructure, and poison the farmland and rivers, finally acquiesce to a cease fire, negotiating under UN auspices. Negotiations proceed to partition the country along the cease fire line with Baghdad as a partitioned city like Jerusalem and the US follows the Israeli lead in dealing with the `occupied' territories of the former Iraq. The residue of Iraq, now referred to as Occupied Iraq (occupied by Iraqis), cut off from Basra and its northern and southern oil fields is kept alive on subsidies from Syria, Jordan, Iran, and Russia, who help arm its re-grouped military into guerilla units who conduct ceaseless raids in the UN-US controlled sectors.

Dot, dot, dot. In twenty years Pentagon documents are finally produced under a new neo-neo-demicrap US regime that shows US war planners had understood partition would be the outcome and begged then president George W Bush to finish the job with tactical nuclear weapons. Fearing his one party election would fail to achieve its expected 80% rubber stamp from the public, he had a failure of nerve. It is now considered opinion the public would have gone along, if he had properly prepared them.

The neo-neo-conservatives angling against the neo-neo-demicraps for their own candidate during the 2020 one party elections claim George W Bush lost Iraq through tragic miscalculation and insufficient determination. Graying military generals who were mere grunts during the period nod in agreement. Yes if we had shelled them with nukes we could have won. Now look at us. We are nothing more than an aging one party totalitarian state confined to our borders to stew in our bitterness and regrets. Well at least we saved all the best. We still have McDonald's, Windows 20-20, and the urban combat SUV. Of course the newer models don't work without an Omicrom butt chip implant for the driver.

We could have been such a great empire!

Chuck Grimes



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list