>I dont think reforms are the answer, or electoral politics, or
>organizing labor, or identity politics. Also, I dont think that the
>enemy is simply 'evil white dudes', or even necessarily dudes - I've got
>to side with Lenin on this one and say its 'imperialism'. Anything short
>of focusing on getting rid of THAT is bound to fall short in one way or
>another because it's bound to fall short of proletarian
>internationalism.
Uh, you're proposing something like going from point A to point Z without suggesting how we'll get to B, much less L or R. Is this more undigested Avakian-thought?
Doug