[lbo-talk] Re: glabalization

Michael Pugliese debsian at pacbell.net
Sat May 24 08:31:11 PDT 2003


On Fri, 23 May 2003 20:28:17 -0700, joanna bujes <joanna.bujes at sun.com> wrote:


>
> You know, I thought he was going to say something half-way interesting
> about enlightenment universals vs globalization universals. NOT!

<URL: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/cup/catalog/data/023111/0231111940.HTM > Desolation and Enlightenment Political Knowledge After Total War, Totalitarianism, and the Holocaust

Ira Katznelson

"The larger intellectual and normative project in this brilliant book is to revise and extend the legacies of Enlightenment thought so as to help us confront war and violence. . . . Today, when we once again face a period of desolations and a new type of total war, Katznelson's book assumes a whole new importance." –Saskia Sassen, author of Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization

During and especially after the Second World War, a group of leading scholars who had been perilously close to the war's devastation joined others fortunate enough to have been protected by distance in an effort to redefine and reinvigorate Western liberal ideals for a radically new age. Treating evil as an analytical category, they sought to discover the sources of twentieth-century horror and the potentialities of the modern state in the wake of western desolation. In the process, they devised strikingly new ways to understand politics, sociology and history that reverberate still. In this major intellectual history, Ira Katznelson examines the works of Hannah Arendt, Robert Dahl, Richard Hofstadter, Harold Lasswell, Charles Lindblom, Karl Polanyi, and David Truman, detailing their engagement with the larger project of reclaiming the West's moral bearing.

In light of their epoch's calamities these intellectuals insisted that the tradition of Enlightenment thought required a new realism, a good deal of renovation, and much recommitment. This array of historians, political philosophers, and social scientists understood that a simple reassertion of liberal modernism had been made radically insufficient by the enormities and moral catastrophes of war, totalitarianism, and holocaust. Confronting their period´s dashed hopes for reason and knowledge, they asked not just whether the Enlightenment should define modernity, but which Enlightenment we should wish to have. Decades later, in the midst of a new type of war and reanimated discussions of the concept of evil, we share no small stake in assessing their successes and limitations.

Contents

Preface and Acknowledgments,     One: Beyond Common Measure     Two: The Origins of Dark Times     Three: A Seminar on the State     Four: A New Objectivity    

About the Author

Ira Katznelson is Ruggles Professor of Political Science and History at Columbia University. He is the author of many books, including Marxism and the City and the award-winning Liberalism's Crooked Circle: Letters to Adam Michnik. He has served as president of the Social Science History Association and of the Politics and History Section of the American Political Science Association.

-
> From the series Leonard Hastings Schoff Lectures



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list