>Doesn't this at least suggest that the idea that first
>world capitalism depends upon, i.e., would collapse
>without, superexploitation of the third world is
>false?
It does. But why, then, is the U.S. security establishment so eager to prevent any departure from the orthodoxy? Do they not understand their own material interests? Or do they see something we're not seeing here?
These are all real, not rhetorical, questions.
Doug