[lbo-talk] Iraqis resist ban on unions

Grant Lee grantlee at iinet.net.au
Fri Nov 7 00:41:00 PST 2003


[When UN cops arrested a union activist in East Timor a few weeks ago, I made a comment about how even the occupiers of Iraq hadn't stooped that low --- apparently I was wrong.]

IRAQ: Workers resist US ban on unions BY ALAN MAASS

* * * *

More than half a year after Saddam Hussein's government collapsed and US officials promised that the economy would be "rebuilt", unemployment in Iraq is estimated at 70%. Just getting by from day to day is the overwhelming challenge for the majority of people.

"The 30% wage rise of US$18, plus the loans and land promised by [top US overseer Paul] Bremer three months ago, has yet to materialise", wrote Ewa Jasiewicz in the October 19 Occupation Watch (<http://www.occupationwatch.org>). Jasiewicz was also with the USLAW delegation. For those who are working, the average wage is $60 a month - the "emergency" pay decreed by the US occupiers of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA).

That wage was exactly the same under Hussein - but Iraqis also received food and housing subsidies that have disappeared under US rule. "So the income of Iraqi workers has gone down", Bacon pointed out, "and that's not even calculating for the exchange value, and therefore the price of anything that's been imported".

* * * *

When it comes to trade unions, however, the US occupation authorities have "found a law passed by Hussein that they like", Bacon said. Passed in 1987, it forbids workers in the state oil industry from organising a union. US officials continue to apply this law.

"To back it up, in June Bremer issued another regulation about `prohibited activity'. Item B under prohibited activities is encouraging anybody to organise any kind of strike or disruption in a factory or any kind of economically important enterprise. The punishment for this is being arrested by the occupation authority and treated as a prisoner of war", explained Bacon.

As Thomas put it, "The US administration is creating this fictionalised picture that goes like this: If we pull out, there's going to be Islamic fundamentalism, ethnic strife and all kinds of chaos. And what they really are afraid of is democracy. They don't want to see Iraqi workers organise and have power - have union rights."

However, within days of the US invasion and the fall of the government, Iraqi workers in factories, on the docks and at oil industry facilities began to organise, "not just to get a wage raise, but also to fight for the control of their jobs and control of the institutions that they work for", said Thomas.

* * * *

In a recent report, Jasiewicz described the struggle of workers at a brick factory that is part of a major industrial complex 48km east of Baghdad.

After enduring terrible conditions and a wage of 3000 dinars a day (US$1.50) for a 14-hour shift, three quarters of the work force walked off the job in October. They marched on management's office and demanded a wage increase, a formal contract, on-site medical facilities and retirement payments.

"The owner had no idea that a union had been formed and told them, `Fine, strike. I will dismiss you, others will come to take your place'", Jasiewicz wrote. "The workers responded by going to their homes, bringing out their guns and spontaneously forming an armed picket line.

"Armed with machine guns, workers guarded the factory and defended their strike from scab labour. The owner, overpowered, ended up granting the workers a raise of 500 dinars ... and agreed to enter into negotiations regarding social and health benefits. The strike was regarded all around as a massive success."

* * * *

[Alan Maass is editor of Socialist Worker, newspaper of the US International Socialist Organisation. Visit <http://www.socialistworker.org/>.]

From Green Left Weekly, November 5, 2003.

http://www.greenleft.org.au/current/560p15.htm



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list