Hell Chuck -- you should get to write & direct "The Matrix 4." What a scenario!
I've finally figured out what went wrong with the two final "Martix" chaps. Joel Silver and Warner Bros. loved the special effects of the first (and superior) film, but weren't all that crazy about the philosophical/political chatter which rings even truer now than it did in '99. So, they pony up millions to ensure that the films (esp "Revs") dazzle the jaded eyes of filmgoers, banking on the fact that with worldwide release, ad tie-ins and DVD Special Editions, they would reap a hefty profit. Meantime, to placate the Wachowskis and those geeks (like me) who took the first film seriously, they give them a smaller budget to do "The Animatrix" shorts which contain all manner of conceptual and philosophical nuggets deemed unfit for the larger commercial enterprises.
Still, as I've said, "Revs" does offer some beautiful visual sequences, only minus any kind of understandable philosophical framework. And that ending with the sunrise -- what the fuck was that? And how do the machines survive without human batteries?
DP