[lbo-talk] Anybody But Bush?

[C. G. Estabrook]

A vote for Gore in 2000 was a vote to confirm an incumbent administration,
and a vote for Bush was a vote for something worse but not substantially
different. So a vote for Nader was a way to reject the incumbency.

I'll vote against incumbency in 2004, as I did in 2000.  --CGE

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 lweiger at umich.edu wrote:


> > No, I voted for Nader and urged others to as well. There's a bit of
> > pride-swallowing for me now to be complaining about Ralph. I'd always had
> > lots of problems with him, but supported him in '96 and '00 anyway. This
> > time I want him to go away. He's an embarrassment now.
> >
> > Doug
> 
> As he was in '00--Ralph hasn't changed, but Doug, Mike, Justin et al. have. 
> 
> 
> (One might argue that the political climate has changed.  Sure, Bush's wars 
> weren't to be expected.  His shameful economic policies, on the other 
> hand...)
> 
> -- Luke
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>