>Presumably, a popular movement, working in alliance with popular
>movements across borders, can take power at the level of a state, not to
>manage it on behalf of capital (like the Workers Party in Brazil), but
>to expropriate the expropriators; and once in power, it can materially
>aid the popular movements outside its borders with which it is in
>alliance.
I'm not at all opposed to taking state power - in fact, I could make a reasonably long list of people I'd like to line up against a wall. Like I said, it's not either/or.
Doug