> Presumably, a popular movement, working in alliance with popular
> movements across borders, can take power at the level of a state, not to
> manage it on behalf of capital (like the Workers Party in Brazil), but
> to expropriate the expropriators; and once in power, it can materially
> aid the popular movements outside its borders with which it is in
> alliance.
For a refutation of this old nonsense, see: http://www.infoshop.org/faq/index.html
<< Chuck0 >>
Homepage -> http://chuck.mahost.org/ Infoshop.org -> http://www.infoshop.org/ Monumental Mistake (blog)-> http://chuck.mahost.org/weblog/index.php Practical Anarchy Online -> http://www.practicalanarchy.org/ Infoshop Portal -> http://portal.infoshop.org/ Infoshop Science -> http://science.infoshop.org/ AIM: AgentHelloKitty
"...ironically, perhaps, the best organised dissenters in the world today are anarchists, who are busily undermining capitalism while the rest of the left is still trying to form committees."
-- Jeremy Hardy, The Guardian (UK)