> Besides, as Ted argues, both arguments can't be true at the same time:
> the multitude are ready to "take it over" and the multitude must vote
> for Anybody But Bush ("or else"). If the multitude were ready to "take
> it over," why bother electing a Democrat?
Because there is no contradiction between electing a politician now and, say, stringing him up next week-?
People, generally speaking, are perfectly capable of understanding and accepting that different situations call for different measures from a pragmatic standpoint, that context is paramount, and that moving forward politically requires a willingness to work, and allow others differently-situated to work, simultaneously on various fronts...
--
/ dave /