> > Besides, as Ted argues, both arguments can't be true at the same time:
>> the multitude are ready to "take it over" and the multitude must vote
>> for Anybody But Bush ("or else"). If the multitude were ready to "take
>> it over," why bother electing a Democrat?
>
>Because there is no contradiction between electing a politician now
>and, say, stringing him up next week-?
Why bother electing a politician if you are capable of "stringing him up next week"?
Once the Democrats win the presidential election in 2004, wait for a chorus of liberals -- including former leftists -- who want us all to shut up and "Give Dean a Chance." -- Yoshie
* Bring Them Home Now! <http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/> * Calendars of Events in Columbus: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/calendar.html>, <http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php>, & <http://www.cpanews.org/> * Student International Forum: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/> * Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio> * Solidarity: <http://www.solidarity-us.org/>