[lbo-talk] Re: What's at stake?

[Michael Dawson]

> Now how do you go from my interpretation (which may,
> after all, be wrong although I think the text supports
> it) of Chuck G's post to the FBI?

Both you and Chuck argue like provocateurs, that's why.  Your argument is
ridiculous (it worked oh so well in 1932 Germany, no?), and its
ridiculousness has been known to real leftists for decades.