I did not say that and I do not think that. What I said was that particular article was a lot of hot air with little evidence and lots of conspiracist speculation. What I am asking for is less credulity and more evidence.
Chip
-----Original Message-----
From: Willy Greenfields [mailto:filthydirtyunwashed at yahoo.com]
Sent: Tue 10/14/2003 1:39 PM
Cc:
Subject: RE: [lbo-talk] Re: recall, camejo vote
> Too much late night watching of Oliver Stone movies.
> The issue of flawed election vote tabulation is
> real. This conspiracist regurgitation of what is a
> staple in right-wing conspiracy sources is of little
> use in organizing against vote fraud.
Are you saying that everyone who thinks that the 2000
election debacle was about interests as opposed to
technics ('vote tabulation') is a conspiracist loon?
Your dismissive tone makes it tough for some of us
movie-goers to tell.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
___________________________________
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 4630 bytes Desc: not available URL: <../attachments/20031014/caa1c569/attachment.bin>