> But you haven't given us any _passages_ from Faulkner (or from the
> machine translation). You have given us little snippets.
>I have a good deal of experience
> with a number of different prose styles, and none of them can
> conceivably be judged, or even discussed, with such snippets as you
> offer.
Some folks scored 100% on the test.
>They proven nothing except that you've never thought much about what prose
is.
I even wrote some. This one is pretty good: http://arxiv.org/ftp/cond-mat/papers/0305/0305150.pdf
Mikhail Simkin --- http://www.ee.ucla.edu/~simkin/