"So, I conclude from your statement that it does not matter to you if a claim is backed by facts or not, as long as it supports your position?"
You claim that the election fraud article is not backed by facts? Your evidence? When I challenged you on that this afternoon you didn't make any effort to reply. So I repeat my post:
Chip Berlet wrote:
>I did not say that and I do not think that. What I said was that
>particular article was a lot of hot air with little evidence and
>lots of conspiracist speculation. What I am asking for is less
>credulity and more evidence.
Are you claiming that the author of this article is *wrong* about the Nebraska, Florida, and Georgia elections? Are you claiming an innocent motivation for the refusal to provide an audit trail for touch-screen votes? If so, what is *your* evidence?
Shane Mage
"When we read on a printed page the doctrine of Pythagoras that all things are made of numbers, it seems mystical, mystifying, even downright silly.
When we read on a computer screen the doctrine of Pythagoras that all things are made of numbers, it seems self-evidently true." (N. Weiner)