[lbo-talk] Moore/Clark: The Bigger ?

[Michael Dawson -PSU]

OK, that's the best point I've heard.  I'll cogitate...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Doug Henwood" <dhenwood at panix.com>
To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Moore/Clark: The Bigger ?


> Michael Dawson -PSU wrote:
> 
> >Meanwhile, the bigger question is:  Do we buy Moore's/the Democrats' 
> >anybody-but-Bush line?  Personally, as a member of the Pacific Green 
> >Party here in Oregon, I'm heavily inclined to disagree and continue 
> >to vote Green.  Can anybody here change my mind on this?  Do you 
> >really think Howard Dean -- he of the Dean-Witter empire -- will 
> >change anything?  I don't.
> 
> I do. Marginally better in policy terms, but a much better 
> environment for radical organizing than when a Republican is in the 
> WH. With a Dem there, it's much better for Greens, who can ask more 
> plausibly, "Has anything significant really changed?" With a Rep in 
> the WH, all anyone can talk about is getting rid of him.
> 
> Doug
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk