[lbo-talk] Chomsky on Foucault

andie nachgeborenen andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 1 08:39:31 PDT 2003


Actually I think Foucault, unleke Derrida or Baudrillard, is a prettuy plain, straughforward writer, not pretty, but not overaly jargonistic, unlike most pomos or analytical philosophers, me included. What exactly of Foucault's ideas did you want to know somjething about? He wrote a lot about a lot of topics? Was there something in particular that puzzled you, or did you want the whole thing inm a paragraph? jks

--- Dennis Perrin <dperrin at comcast.net> wrote:
> Caught this over at ZNet -- the famous linguist on
> the late French mystifier:
>
> "Chomsky: Foucault is an interesting case because
> I'm sure he honestly wants to undermine power but I
> think with his writings he reinforced it. The only
> way to understand Foucault is if you are a graduate
> student or you are attending a university and have
> been trained in this particular style of discourse.
> That's a way of guaranteeing, it might not be his
> purpose, but that's a way of guaranteeing that
> intellectuals will have power, prestige and
> influence. If something can be said simply say it
> simply, so that the carpenter next door can
> understand you. Anything that is at all well
> understood about human affairs is pretty simple. I
> find Foucault really interesting but I remain
> skeptical of his mode of expression. I find that I
> have to decode him, and after I have decoded him
> maybe I'm missing something. I don't get the
> significance of what I am left with. I have never
> effectively understood what he was talking about. I
> mean, when I try to take the big words he uses and
> put them into words that I can understand and use,
> it is difficult for me to accomplish this task It
> all strikes me as overly convoluted and very
> abstract. But -what happens when you try to skip
> down to real cases? The trouble with Foucault and
> with this certain kind of theory arises when it
> tries to come down to earth. Really, nobody was able
> to explain to me the importance of his work..."
>
>
<http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=41&ItemID=4107>
>
> You certainly see this on the "Manufacturing
> Consent" DVD Special Features section. Foucault
> prattles on on on on while Chomsky strains to make
> sense of what he's saying. I've known more than a
> few lefties who find value in Foucault's work, and
> like Chomsky I don't understand it. Are there any
> Foucault fanciers here who might give it a go?
>
> DP
>
>

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list