>>Excuse me? Are you familiar with traditional indigenous cultures such as
>>those of North America, and elsewhere too? Reverence for nature has been
>>part of many cultures...
>
>
But isn't the very idea of "nature" a relatively modern concept, a sign of our very alienation from it?
Doug
The issue was whether "reverence for nature" was modern. Both Maria and I strongly objected. You are now raising the issue in another way by asking whether the concept of a separable "nature" is not modern. Where does "modern" start? I would say that the notion of a nature that is separable from man and which man "governs" is at least as "modern" or "old" as the Old Testament. Before monotheism, I don't know.
It may be that those cultures who honor/revere nature do not refer to it as a separable thing, but this does not diminish the terms they make with their sustaining (and inseparable) environment. In our terms they do "revere nature" -- which Chris argued was a modern fetish...
Joanna