> Well, leaving aside the "wealth of the parties" thing,
> one might, with Rawls, characterize adversary
> procedures as imperfect procedural justice. That is
> required when we don't know the correct answer to
> start with. Of course democracy itself provides only
> imperfect procedural justice -- unless, like Luke, you
> do know the correct answer,a nd than therefore impose
> it by fiat, circumventing democracy.
I'm puzzled. Is this supposed to be referring to my support for some non-UN approved interventions?
-- Luke