[lbo-talk] Re: perot vs nader (or, naderphobia continued?)

[snitilicious at tampabay.rr.com]

At 05:43 PM 4/30/2004, SergioL652 at aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 4/30/2004 10:57:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
>dhenwood at panix.com writes:
>And what about Kucinich? He was in all the Dem debates, and got a
>chance to air his views. Why couldn't he get more than 1-2% of the
>primary vote - the Democratic primary, where voters are to the left
>of the general election? It's easy to blame money or the media, but
>the problem is more complex than that.
>
>Doug
>
>Because progressives refused to back him up.
>
>Sergio

if all those progressives who were registered democrats (what? all 2893 of 
them) had voted, would it have boosted his numbers?

Kelley